# how to convert single precision floating point to decimal

This would equal a mantissa of 1 with an exponent of -127 which is the smallest number we may represent in floating point. If you could give only one answer, the safe answer is 6 digits. Tools & Thoughts IEEE-754 Floating Point Converter Translations: de This page allows you to convert between the decimal representation of numbers (like "1.02") and the binary format used by all modern CPUs (IEEE 754 floating point). This is done as it allows for easier processing and manipulation of floating point numbers. eg. It is known as IEEE 754. For a power of two exponent that crosses a power of ten exponent? This simplified notion of equivalence does not extend to the conversion of floating-point systems. Converting decimal fractions to binary is no different. 1.01300003e-4. It's not 0 but it is rather close and systems know to interpret it as zero exactly. A nice side benefit of this method is that if the left most bit is a 1 then we know that it is a positive exponent and it is a large number being represented and if it is a 0 then we know the exponent is negative and it is a fraction (or small number). If our number to store was 0.0001011011 then in scientific notation it would be 1.011011 with an exponent of -4 (we moved the binary point 4 places to the right). Every float had multiple decimals mapping to it. Converting the exponent to decimal: The conversion is a basic binary to decimal conversion. Binary Numbers, Binary Code, and Binary Logic. -7 + 127 is 120 so our exponent becomes - 01111000. Let’s look at the precision of decimal floating-point numbers with decimal exponent -4, the range [10-4, 10-3): Between 10-4 and 10-3 there are five segments: [10-4, 2-13), [2-13, 2-12), [2-12, 2-11), [2-11, 2-10), and [2-10, 10-3); they have decimal precision of 8, 7, 7, 7, and 6 digits, respectively. The easiest approach is a method where we repeatedly multiply the fraction by 2 and recording whether the digit to the left of the decimal point is a 0 or 1 (ie, if the result is greater than 1), then discarding the 1 if it is. Remember that the exponent can be positive (to represent large numbers) or negative (to represent small numbers, ie fractions). This is the same with binary fractions however the number of values we may not accurately represent is actually larger. To convert from floating point back to a decimal number just perform the steps in reverse. There are 18 powers of ten for which precision dips to 6 digits. So the best way to learn this stuff is to practice it and now we'll get you to do just that. 6-112 digits? Extending this to fractions is not too difficult as we are really just using the same mechanisms that we are already familiar with. binary -> decimal n = 24, N = 9. which agrees nicely with your results and Bruce’s. I do a more granular analysis instead of just assigning the maximum guaranteed precision per power of ten exponent. You don't need a Ph.D. to convert to floating-point. When writing a number in single or double precision, the steps to a successful conversion will be the same for both, the only change occurs when converting the exponent and mantissa. 4. On the other hand, if you understand what it really means to equate decimal floating-point precision with binary floating-point precision, then only some of those answers make sense. What is the similarly qualified 16 significant digit number that won’t make the round trip through a double-precision value? It is also a base number system. In this article, I will argue that there are only three reasonable answers: “6 digits”, “6-8 digits”, and “slightly more than 7 digits on average”. I don’t analyze subnormal numbers, where the precision can go down to as low as 0 digits. There’s not enough precision to represent all 9-digit numbers. I can’t say it better than David Matula himself, as he did in his 1970 paper “A Formalization of Floating-Point Numeric Base Conversion”: “Converting integer and fixed-point data to an “equivalent” differently based number system is generally achieved by utilizing essentially logδΒ times as many digits in the new base δ as were present for representing numbers in the old base Β system. The 9-digits for floats comes from those who store floats in text formats. In this section, we'll start off by looking at how we represent fractions in binary. Bits 22 - 0 Significand Decimal value of the significand. Rounding from floating-point to 32-bit representation uses the IEEE-754 round-to-nearest-value mode. Some of you may remember that you learnt it a while back but would like a refresher. But it does tell you that you are likely to get 7 digits. To get around this we use a method of representing numbers called floating point. Binary is a positional number system. By the same argument above, the precision of a double is not log10(253) ≈ 15.95. If the number is negative, set it to 1. I talk solely about decimal precision of binary numbers so as not to confound precision with floating-point to decimal to floating-point round-trip theory. For those powers of two with a single precision, I assigned a weight of 1. It is simply a matter of switching the sign bit. This example finishes after 8 bits to the right of the binary point but you may keep going as long as you like. This becomes the exponent. Floating point is quite similar to scientific notation as a means of representing numbers. It is the choice of range which leads to the multiple answers. Whilst double precision floating point numbers have these advantages, they also require more processing power. Again, this is a positive number (the first bit, the sign, is 0), the exponent is 10000100 and the mantissa is 1.00010111001 (omitting any zeros at the end and adding back the omitted 1 in front of the decimal point). This means that we must factor it into a … Double precision works exactly the same, just with more bits. 1.013e-4 converts to 1.01300000096671283245086669921875e-4, which appears to have 9 digits of precision; but it’s in an 8-digit segment. To allow for negative numbers in floating point we take our exponent and add 127 to it. As mentioned above if your number is positive, make this bit a 0. For the whole floating-point format? 82.17% of the range has 16 digits and 17.83% has 15 digits. (-1) 0 = 1. 3. If we want to represent the decimal value 128 we require 8 binary digits ( 10000000 ). Bits 0-22 (on the right) give the fraction For example, does an IEEE single-precision binary floating-point number, or float as it’s known, have 6-8 digits? The average across just those two powers of two would be (7*1 + 7*0.2 + 8*0.8)/2 = 7.4. With that methodology, I came up with an average decimal precision for single-precision floating-point: 7.09 digits. Put 0.085 in single-precision format. So in decimal the number 56.482 actually translates as: In binary it is the same process however we use powers of 2 instead. I was curious what the smallest positive 7 significant digit number greater than 1 was that can’t make a round trip into a single-precision float and back to a string.