new theory of quantum mechanics

You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties. The universe didn’t appear when humans started looking at it.”. You need to be a subscriber to join the conversation. Rovelli said: “We don’t understand quantum mechanics yet. We urge you to turn off your ad blocker for The Telegraph website so that you can continue to access our quality content in the future. Following Occam's razor, the law of parsimony named after William of Ockham, the researchers have now chosen the simplest explanation from those that fit. “But when we make a measurement, we have to cause an interaction - bumping bits of matter together - and people started to suspect that the interaction necessary for the measurement is what causes it. Click here to sign in with Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox. When a measurement is made, the experimenter has to cause an interaction, and when two particles bump together, they 'get their bearings', and find out where the cylinders they live on are in space. "We study quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. This document is subject to copyright. Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. Physics is a great hobby for a civil servant. So the cylinders are set at many angles at once. Kerr told The Telegraph: “For 70 years it was assumed that just observing the world brings it into a more concrete state of existence. Why find the highest order maxima/minima in slit equations? In addition to the study of quantum mechanics, Lindgren and Liukkonen have many other things in common: they were both members of the same maths club at Kuopio Lyceum High School, they both have done post-graduate research, and both have careers ascivil servants. Your feedback will go directly to Science X editors. Take a look at these three statements: When someone observes an event happening, it really happened. According to the traditional interpretation of the principle, location and momentum cannot be determined simultaneously to an arbitrary degree of precision, as the person conducting the measurement always affects the values. Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. But is an explanation really an explanation, if it's a vague one?" Known as ‘the measurement problem’ it is widely seen as the major complication in quantum theory and has led even well-respected scientists to suggest that the human mind may be having some kind of telepathic influence on the fabric of the universe - our thoughts actually shaping reality around us. Quantum mechanics is difficult to understand at the best of times, but new evidence suggests that the current standard view of how particles behave on the quantum scale could be very, very wrong. “This idea would remove what some might see as the 'woo-woo' from quantum physics - mind, consciousness, the observer.”. Turok, a former Professor of Mathematics Physics at Cambridge University, and nowNiels Bohr Chair and Director Emeritus at Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada, said: “If you say it’s measurements then you immediately bring quantum mechanics down to the observer. This is when quantum mechanics became very confusing to people. On the other hand, Karl Popper and Albert Einstein thought that an objective reality exists. "The interpretation is objective and realistic, and at the same time as simple as possible. To the average person, quantum mechanics is the convoluted, science fiction-y branch of physics. The hard part was finding a way to do this that didn’t cause the new theory to contradict any of quantum mechanics’ many unerring predictions. A radical new theory plays into that, proposing that parallel universes exist and interact with each other ‒ and that scientists may be able to test for them. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no Medical Xpress covers all medical research advances and health news, Tech Xplore covers the latest engineering, electronics and technology advances, Science X Network offers the most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web. Rovelli came up with the theory of Relational Quantum Mechanics in the 1990s to suggest that it was not observation causing the shift from wave to particles but probably interactions. New theory of quantum mechanics shows matter is not in the eye of the observer Save The measurement problems has plagued theoretical physics for nearly 100 years Credit: Getty Images They all point in the same direction, being parallel, but that direction is unfixed, or undecided. Quantum Field Theory, its successor, was developed from the study of the interactions of these particles. Lindgren and Liukkonen utilized stochastic dynamic optimization in their study. In the old quantum theory, we could think about particles moving in normal ways. “So removing the observer is fundamental and removing measurement as having this elevated special state is something that people have been aspiring to do for a long time.”. What were these studies and interactions that would change our matter worldview from that of a deterministic one to a probabilistic one? In his theory space is made up from a series of dimensions, curled into cylinders which lie side-by-side, similar to string theory. googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1449240174198-2'); }); In their most recent article, Finnish civil servants Jussi Lindgren and Jukka Liukkonen, who study quantum mechanics in their free time, take a look at the uncertainty principle that was developed by Heisenberg in 1927. Find out more, The Telegraph values your comments but kindly requests all posts are on topic, constructive and respectful. Many interpretations, including the Copenhagen interpretation presented by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, and in particular, von Neumann-Wigner interpretation, state that the consciousness of the person conducting the test affects its result. The mystery of why quantum matter jumps from a wave-like state to a well-defined particle when it is observed has puzzled scientists for nearly a 100 years. “Does it require a physicist in a lab to create the universe? However, in their study Lindgren and Liukkonen concluded that the correlation between a location and momentum, i.e., their relationship, is fixed. Your opinions are important to us. The American theoretical physicist Richard Feynman once said: “I think it is safe to say nobody understands quantum mechanics.”. or, by Aalto University. “Many physicists are very unhappy with the solipsistic view that our presence in the universe is somehow critical to its existence. The idea was first posited by some scientists in the 1990s but it has been an unfinished until now. “The idea that one should replace the notion of measurement to one of interactions is a key one. The method they used was stochastic optimal control theory, which has been used to solve such challenges as how to send a rocket from the Earth to the Moon. Kerr, the nephew of the late author Judith Kerr, has just published a book on his theory and an article is due to appear in a well-respected peer reviewed journal soon. If there is something clear it’s that it is not clear.

Vegan Market Size, Pinching Out Broad Beans, Used 8 Inch Telescope For Sale, Lemon Dipping Sauce For Shrimp, L Invasion De La Mer, Type 3 Ordinary Construction, How To Get Join Epic Badge, Chicken Keema Recipe Faiza, Eastleigh College Vacancies, Computer Soft Skills List,

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.